g/gstackGarry's Stack an interactive field guide
The workflow around the agent

Ship the work.
Keep the judgment.

gstack is a set of specialist workflows for the whole engineering loop — from understanding the real product to a release you can verify. This tiny deck is a demonstration of the /deck skill itself.

01 / Thesis

An AI agent is better with a crew around it.

The model can write code. gstack gives the work a repeatable rhythm: a product lens, an architecture lens, a designer's eye, a QA lead, and a release gate.

Core promise judgment at every handoff
the loop01 — 07
g/
understanddesignverifyship
02 / Observe

Start with the real thing.

Before a plan, see the site, product, routes, constraints, and evidence. The first move is not “pick a framework”; it is “understand what exists.”

/browse https://your-site.example
evidence before opinioninput
01
See the surface

Use /browse for the live flow; use /scrape when structured evidence is the job.

02
Find the constraint

/investigate traces symptoms to a root cause before anyone edits the code.

03
Keep the boundary

Access, privacy, and deployment choices become explicit instead of accidental.

03 / Decide

Turn a vague request into a decision.

The planning skills force the useful questions early: what matters to the user, what is technically true, what should be beautiful, and what can wait.

/autoplan
four lensesdecision quality
CEO

/plan-ceo-review finds the sharpest product hiding in the request.

Engineering

/plan-eng-review closes architecture and edge-case gaps.

Design

/plan-design-review turns taste into an explicit bar.

Developer experience

/plan-devex-review tests the path a real person must take.

04 / Build

Make the important path feel obvious.

Specialists are useful when their output is a handoff, not a performance. Build the product, the design system, the deck, or the diagram with the next reviewer already in mind.

/design-html → /deck
the handoffmake it tangible
A
Concrete surfaces

Prefer the actual workflow, screenshot, interaction, or evidence over feature-card fog.

B
Responsive by intent

Mobile is a composition with its own hierarchy, not a desktop layout squeezed narrower.

C
Accessible by default

Deep links, keyboard controls, readable contrast, and focus states are part of “done.”

05 / Prove

Confidence comes from seeing it fail.

A green unit test is not a usable product. gstack puts real browser behavior, visual review, security, performance, and staff-level review in the same loop.

/design-review → /qa → /review
proof, not vibesquality loop
01
Look at the pixels

/design-review catches density, clipping, hierarchy, and AI-slop patterns.

02
Drive the flow

/qa opens the real browser, finds bugs, and re-verifies the fix.

03
Challenge the diff

/review, /cso, and /benchmark look for the failures CI cannot see.

06 / Ship

Release with a receipt.

The finish line is not “merged.” It is a change that has been reviewed, deployed through the project's real path, and checked where users will meet it.

/ship → /land-and-deploy → /canary
controlled releaseoutput
01
Ship the smallest coherent diff

Run the repository's tests and source review before the PR leaves the workspace.

02
Verify the built route

Direct links, refreshes, assets, headers, and the normal site path all get checked.

03
Watch the landing

/canary monitors the live surface after deployment instead of declaring victory early.

07 / Learn

Every release should make the next one smarter.

Context survives the session. Retros turn the work into better defaults. Documentation closes the loop for the next human and the next agent.

/retro → /learn

This is a static demonstration of gstack's workflow. It makes no network requests, collects no analytics, and contains no product-specific customer evidence.

the loop closesnext run
↗
context-savedocument-releaseretrobetter default